In the quest to unravel the mysteries of anti-gravity and mass reduction propulsion, as well as other speculative technologies that might defy gravity and inertia, Einstein’s theory of general relativity (GR) frequently serves as a reference point. Scientists and enthusiasts alike delve into its intricate constructs, seeking insights that could illuminate these enigmatic modes of motion.
In Newton’s theory, gravity is a force that objects exert on each other depending on their masses and the distance between them. In contrast, General Relativity (GR) posits that gravity is not a force but rather a result of objects moving along the curves of spacetime, which are deformed by the presence of mass and energy. Thus, GR interprets gravity as the curvature of spacetime, a four-dimensional continuum, influenced by the distribution of mass and energy within it. Einstein’s theory of general relativity is a fundamental element in mainstream science.
However, we must examine the effectiveness of this theory in fostering the development of advanced propulsion systems capable of counteracting gravity, propelling us beyond the archaic reliance on rocket propulsion that consumes vast amounts of chemical or fossil fuels. Does general relativity hold the keys to unlocking technologies that can defy gravity and render traditional chemical or fossil rockets obsolete? It is a pivotal question that challenges us to rethink the boundaries of current scientific paradigms.
To send a relatively small payload into space, we must expend an enormous amount of energy. We are forced to do so by the Earth’s gravitational force and the inertial forces caused by the acceleration of the spacecraft. The problem with GR is that, so far, it has not provided a suitable solution for controlling gravitational and inertial forces. This theory is more than a century old. During this time, GR has not assisted us in unveiling the covert manipulation of gravity, nor has it been able to offer any perspective on it.
Understanding how to control gravity and inertia lays the foundation for developing propulsion similar to that used by UFO craft. It appears that the entities behind these spacecraft have adeptly solved all problems related to gravity and inertia.
In many instances, UFOs have demonstrated the ability to ascend vertically into space with ease. They fly silently and lack any identifiable signature related to their propulsion. These crafts float in the air and achieve enormous speeds instantaneously without any noticeable acceleration. In contrast, our rocket propulsion systems appear quite primitive. For more details on this topic, refer to the blog “Is the UFO’s propulsion system based on a mass manipulation device?”.
UFOs of a wide range of sizes have been observed. In addition to the classic UFO aircraft measuring approximately ten meters in length, witnesses were also able to observe enormous UFO aircraft the size of several aircraft carriers. However, very small crafts, typically spherical in shape and the size of a basketball or even smaller, have been frequently observed. Most likely, those small spheres are some kind of UFO drone.
It is interesting that no difference was noticed in the flight characteristics of UFO aircraft, regardless of their size. UFOs of any size seem to be capable of defying gravity and inertia. This implies that propulsion, regardless of the size of the UFO craft, is based on the same principles.
As for small UFO craft, they prove to us that the performance of a small UFO drive is very possible and achievable. It is obvious that even such small drives are capable of manipulating inertia and gravity in some way. It would appear that a significant amount of energy and other resources are not required to accomplish all of this. When it comes to the hardware, everything that is required to create such a compact UFO drive can fit on a small table. The only thing we lack is the knowledge of how to make it happen.
So far, the only GR-based drive principle that has been proposed is the oft-mentioned hypothetical WARP drive or Alcubierre drive. Aside from the currently unknown negative mass, such a drive would also require a colossal amount of energy. Some assume that the energy (mass) of the entire universe is required, whereas others assume that the energy of the Sun or even Jupiter is sufficient. Using a WARP drive near the Earth or even the solar system would be extremely dangerous because of the high energies and strong effects on spacetime. All of the above indicates that the characteristics of the WARP drive do not even remotely correspond to those of the UFO drive.
The road to UFO propulsion
Various anomalies have been observed in relation to UFO aircraft, which are obviously related to their propulsion.
Four significant anomalies related to a UFO craft’s propulsion system were observed:
- The effect of gravity on the UFO craft is reduced.
- The inertia force of the UFO craft is reduced.
- The interaction of UFO craft with the environment (air, water) is reduced.
- The flow of time in the vicinity of the UFO craft is slowed.
Based on these anomalies, it is possible to conclude that the basis of UFO propulsion is related to gravity and inertial anomalies. Gravitational and inertial forces on the craft are directly associated with its mass. This could imply that the UFO propulsion system can change the influence of gravitational and inertial forces by reducing the craft’s mass. The other two anomalies (interaction and time) could be secondary effects of UFO propulsion, but they could also be the result of the work of additional UFO devices.
To achieve the main goal of understanding how to modify the mass of the craft and thus enable the development of propulsion similar to UFO propulsion, the research could be carried out in the following steps:
During the initial phase of research, it must be determined which physics knowledge and experimental results point us in the direction of understanding the mechanisms of mass, gravity, and inertia.
We know that something we call mass is closely related to gravitational and inertial forces as well as to the creation of a gravitational field. Because of this, most of what we know about mass comes from studying how inertial and gravitational forces work. Understanding the mechanisms of these forces will undoubtedly lead to a better understanding of the origin and mechanism of mass. Once these mechanisms and all of the secret masses are understood, this knowledge will serve as the foundation for discovering ways to change, i.e., reduce the mass of a body.
The final step entails applying the acquired knowledge to build propulsion based on mass modification (manipulation), similar to UFO propulsion. All this could also lead to the development and realization of artificial gravity.
Is GR applicable to researching UFO propulsion principles?
Regarding GR, it is questionable what attitude to take toward that theory. Does this theory correspond to the intentions to be achieved?
First of all, it is important to know whether GR will lead us to an understanding of the mechanism that causes gravity and inertia. Understanding that mechanism could open up the possibilities of manipulating inertia and gravity. All of this may also help us comprehend the fundamentals of UFO propulsion.
It is essential to investigate and comprehend the “profitability” of using GR or any other theory to study the stated goals of manipulating gravity and inertia, as well as the principles of UFO propulsion.
Without taking into account all other criticisms of GR, I find the following few points demotivating in terms of using GR as a starting point for researching the stated goals:
- Since GR has not provided a solution for anti-gravity or a similar drive for more than a century, it is unlikely that it will be useful in the future.
- Tesla talked about something that sounds like an antigravity craft more than once (from 1911 onwards). The ideas behind how this Tesla craft works may have ended up in tightly guarded military files. So, this happened before Einstein published GR in 1915. If Tesla really managed to discover the principles of an antigravity craft, then it is clear that he did not achieve it with the help of GR. More about it: Censored science
- There are numerous criticisms of the principle of equivalence. It appears that the principle of equivalence, on which GR is based, is not a good foundation for such a theory. In the following articles, I will go into greater detail about this.
- Four-dimensional space-time is a strange entity. A lot of physicists are not happy with that. Some physicists even assert there is no time. With ideas such as four-dimensional space-time, the bending of space-time, and in a sense, the principle of equivalence, the actual mechanisms of nature’s operation are obscured. Many things can be put together in mathematics, but the question is whether nature works in this manner.
- Physics has linked numerous things to mass. Do we truly comprehend the concept of mass? Does mass possess one or multiple mechanisms? How can the interaction of mass with so many physical phenomena be explained? Have we attributed too much to the one property we have called mass?
To give a clearer overall picture, I tried to incorporate almost everything related to the concept of mass into the drawing. Clearly, the mass has an impact on or a connection to many physical phenomena. From this, it is not hard to infer that something with multiple interconnected mechanisms exists behind what we consider to be a mass.
Conclusion
With his concepts of space-time, space-time bending, and the principle of equivalence, Einstein appears to have skipped some “stairs” in understanding nature. Perhaps this is why the question of how mass creates gravity and inertia remains unanswered. We don’t know what happen on those “stairs” that were skipped. As a result, we are unsure how much we can rely on GR’s solutions.
We must accept that the mechanism of mass, gravity, and inertia, is not explained by GR, nor by any other physics theory. This knowledge, however, is required to understand how to bypass gravity and inertia and create a device such as an anti-gravity drive or mass manipulation drive. Therefore, this is what has yet to be discovered. We’ll probably need to restart the research from scratch and go back to Newton’s forces in order to achieve this.
Otherwise, it is well known that GR is incompatible with quantum mechanics (cannot be unified). This is yet another disadvantage of GR. In any case, a new theory that fully explains mass, gravity, and inertia mechanisms must agree with quantum mechanics.